[en] English   [fr] fran?ais   [ru] русский  

GNU ethical repository criteria

We developed these criteria to judge services for hosting parts of the GNU operating system, but we recommend them to everyone that wants to use a service for publicly hosting free source code (and optionally executable programs too). The criteria emphasize protection of privacy, functionality without nonfree JavaScript, compatibility with copyleft licensing and philosophy, and not rejecting any users.

GNU also maintains evaluations of code-hosting sites by the standards of these criteria. If you'd like to help us evaluate more sites or update existing evaluations as sites improve (or worsen) their scores, join the repo-criteria-discuss mailing list.

Version 1.1

F — Unacceptable

C — Acceptable hosting for a GNU package

B — Good enough to recommend

The above criteria, plus:

A — Excellent

The above criteria, plus:

A+ — Extra credit

The above criteria, plus:

Acknowledgements

The following individuals have helped as evaluators or otherwise contributed ideas, suggestions and improvements to this document.

If you are interested in helping with the evaluation or have any corrections, please contact [email protected].

If you are interested in helping to make code hosting sites LibreJS compliant (C0.0 and B0 criteria), please contact Mike Gerwitz at <[email protected]>.

TOP

 [FSF logo] “The Free Software Foundation (FSF) is a nonprofit with a worldwide mission to promote computer user freedom. We defend the rights of all software users.”

JOIN SHOP

招财蟾蜍APP 棒球比分捷报 大唐麻将山西怎么代理 王者荣耀比分网 添盈聚富 球探篮球比分即时足球比分 幸运双星 双色近1000期走势图 即时竞彩足球比分直播 男人的天堂2018东京热 北京十一选五最新开 幸运十一选五最新开奖结果 大赢家比分直播 尚牛在线 3d预测排行榜 广州酒店小姐按摩 任选9场